Abstract The year 2021 brought the first decisions in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as the first request for an advisory opinion under Article 29 of the Oviedo Convention. The Grand Chamber developed its case-law concerning Article 3 in the context of domestic violence. Furthermore, it addressed the threats that bulk interception by states poses to rights protected under Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention and developed procedural minimum standards in this respect.
Leading Cases in the European Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence 2021
AufsätzeUniv.-Prof. MMag. Dr. Andreas Th. Müller , Mag.a Theresa M. WeiskopfZÖR 2022, 1175 Heft 4 v. 29.12.2022
Inhalt
- I. Introduction
- II. Article 1 of the Convention
- III. Article 2 of the Convention
- IV. Article 3 of the Convention
- V. Article 5 of the Convention
- VI. Article 6 of the Convention: Tribunal Established by Law: The Case of Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o v Poland
- VII. Article 8 of the Convention
- VIII. Article 9 of the Convention
- IX. Article 10 of the Convention
- X. Article 11 of the Convention: Freedom to Form and Join a Trade Union: The Case of Yakut Republican Trade-Union Federation v Russia
- XI. Article 35 of the Convention: Abuse of the Right of Application: The Case of Zambrano v France
- XII. Article 2 Protocol No 7 of the Convention: Right to Appeal: The Case of Kindlhofer v Austria
- XIII. Article 1 of Protocol No 16 of the Convention: Advisory Opinion Requested by the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic
- XIV. Article 29 of the Oviedo Convention: Advisory Opinion Requested by the Council of Europe’s Committee on Bioethics
- XV. Concluding Remarks
- References
