International child abduction and domestic violence concerns continue to pose a significant challenge in the realm of international family law. The US Supreme Court highlighted this issue by revisiting the Hague Convention's fundamental principles and restricting the lower court's discretion in "obvious" grave risk situations. The following article examines the approach introduced in the "Golan v. Saada" case and its efficacy in solving the inherent conflict between the Convention's fundamental aim and domestic violence allegations.
