Abstract The year 2019 marks the first infringement proceeding under Article 46(4) as well as the first advisory opinion under Protocol No. 16 of the Convention. Overall, the Grand Chamber delivered fourteen judgments. One of these judgments concerned just satisfaction in an inter-State application. In relation to individual applications directed against Austria, the year 2019 brought a modest number of five judgments. Out of the five judgments, one is of particular interest regarding States obligations in cases concerning Article 2 and domestic violence.
Leading Cases in the European Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence 2019
AufsätzeAndreas Th. Müller , Theresa M. Weiskopf**Univ.-Prof. MMag. Dr. Andreas Th. Müller, LL.M. (Yale), <andreas.mueller@uibk.ac.at >.****Mag. Theresa M. Weiskopf, <theresa.weiskopf@uibk.ac.at >; both: Institut für Europarecht und Völkerrecht, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Österreich.ZÖR 2020, 915 Heft 4 v. 5.12.2020
Inhalt
- I. Introduction
- II. Article 1 of the Convention: Admissibility ratione loci: The Güzelyurtlu and others v Cyprus and Turkey Case
- III. Article 2 of the Convention
- IV. Article 3 of the Convention
- V. Article 5 of the Convention
- VI. Article 6 of the Convention
- VII. Article 8 of the Convention
- VIII. Article 10 of the Convention: First-Hand Information Gathering: The Szurovecz v Hungary Case
- IX. Article 14 of the Convention: Bedroom Tax: The J. D. and A. v United Kingdom Case
- X. Article 35 of the Convention: Abuse of the Right of Application: The Zhdanov and others v Russia Case
- XI. Article 41 of the Convention: Just Satisfaction in an Inter-State Case: The Georgia v Russia (I) Case
- XII. Article 46 of the Convention
- XIII. Article 2 Protocol No. 1 of the Convention: The Stoian v Romania Case
- XIV. Article 4 Protocol No. 7 of the Convention: The Mihalache v Romania Case
- XV. Protocol No. 16: Advisory Opinion requested by the French Court of Cassation
- XVI. Concluding Remarks
- References
