Abstract The year 2017 brought the remarkable number of 24 judgments in relation to individual applications directed against Austria, 16 of which found a violation of the Convention. The pattern of the “usual suspects" in terms of affected Convention rights has widely remained intact. The reported judgments and inadmissibility decisions mostly deal with Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention. As in previous years, the Court specifically reminded Austria that it had already repeatedly found violations of Article 6 due to the excessive length of proceedings.
The European Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence on Austria 2017
AufsatzAndreas Th. Müller**Univ.-Prof. MMag. Dr. Andreas Th. Müller, LL.M. (Yale), Institut für Europarecht und Völkerrecht, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 52, Christoph-Probst-Platz, 6020 Innsbruck, Österreich, < andreas.mueller@uibk.ac.at >.ZÖR 2018, 871 Heft 4 v. 1.12.2018
Inhalt
- I. Introduction
- II. Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention: The Ceesay and D.L. cases
- III. Article 4 of the Convention: The J. and others case
- IV. Article 5 of the Convention: The Lorenz case
- V. Article 6 of the Convention
- VI. Article 8 of the Convention
- VII. Article 10 of the Convention: The Standard Verlagsgesellschaft mbH and Haupt cases
- VIII. Concluding remarks
- References
